|
ISSUE 2 |
E-mail in practice I found Dr Kane's review of the use of e-mail in clinical practice to be comprehensive and thought-provoking [SIMQ Issue 1]. In my own practice, a three-office, two-physician, busy Family Practice in New York City, I have taken a tentative step in the direction of incorporating electronic communications into the physician-patient interaction. Because I have serious reservations about the medicolegal issues as well as some of the other issues Dr Kane raised, my use of e-mail with patients has been limited to the reporting of normal test results. Patients are given the opportunity to provide their e-mail addresses on our initial registration forms (nearly twenty percent report they have e-mail capabilities). They are further asked whether they would object to the reporting of test results via e-mail. Only a handful have declined, citing confidentiality issues with shared terminals and e-mail servers in the workplace. When I report normal test results to a patient via e-mail, I preface the report by stating that:
Finally, a note is made in the patient's chart that results were reported via e-mail. So far, the response has been positive. My own reaction is that some of my time is saved by reporting results in this manner. I'll keep you apprised of further developments, including other uses of e-mail in our practice.
Mark E. Horowitz MD
Comments to: simq@cybertas.demon.co.uk
|